| a00.de |
|
||
TCP-group 1994
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Should we share?
- To: TCP-Group@ucsd.edu
- Subject: Re: Should we share?
- From: neill.p.taylor@aea.orgn.uk (Neill Taylor)
- Date: Thu, 01 Dec 1994 08:50:55 +0000
Steven R. Sampson wrote:
>ZZ9ZZZ is then:
>
> Z 26 * 10 ^ 6 26000000
> Z 26 * 10 ^ 5 2600000
> 9 9 * 10 ^ 4 90000
> Z 26 * 10 ^ 3 26000
> Z 26 * 10 ^ 2 2600
> Z 26 * 10 ^ 1 260
> --------------------------------
> Total 28718860 Fits in 32 bits
> Hex 01 B6 37 0C
> HAM IP Address 1.182.55.12
> Gateway IP Address 44.00.00.78 For example.
Nice idea, but it doesn't give unique addresses, I'm afraid. Try, for
example, encoding these two callsigns in this scheme:
ZZ9ZBA ZZ9ZAK
You will find they both give 1.185.156.249.
Neill G4HLX
----------------------------------------
Internet: neill.p.taylor@aea.orgn.uk
AMPRnet: g4hlx@g4hlx.ampr.org
AX.25: G4HLX@GB7SDN.#49.GBR.EU
----------------------------------------
- Follow-Ups:
- smashing down callsigns into 32 bits
- From: California Wireless Incorporated <cwi@rahul.net>
- smashing down callsigns into 32 bits
- Prev by Date: Re: Should we share?
- Next by Date: Re: Should we share?
- Previous by thread: Re: Should we share?
- Next by thread: smashing down callsigns into 32 bits
- Index(es):
|
Document URL : http://www.a00.de/tcpgroup/1994/msg00003.php Ralf D. Kloth, Ludwigsburg, DE (QRQ.software). < hostmaster at a00.de > [don't send spam] Created 2004-10-04. Last modified 2004-10-04. Your visit 2024-04-26 22:15.56. Page created in 0.0218 sec. [Go to the top of this page] [... to the index page] |