RSPF meets the Route table quandary
- To: firstname.lastname@example.org (TCP Group)
- Subject: RSPF meets the Route table quandary
- From: email@example.com (Andy Warner)
- Date: Tue, 14 Jan 92 11:06:56 CST
> Ping, however, gets to the real_subnet (that is, the AX.25 layer) via
> IPROUTE. But the point of RSPF is to _create_ the IP routing table.
> So in order to ping somebody, that somebody has to have the
> subnet-in-question named as the path-of-choice in the NOS Route table.
> But once it's in the Route table, its previous entry in that table is
> lost. Yet the route to be pinged may not be the route of choice.
> If there were a way to test routes without touching the Route table, it
> would be easier. I rather like the way OSI treats IS-IS; it's not
> _above_ the network layer, but _within_ it, so it can directly talk to
> the real_subnet when needed. OSPF and RIP go so far as to put a
> transport layer below the IGP; RPSF is an IGP that runs directly atop
> IP, but still needs to go through IP.
One idle thought I had about a similar problem, was to treat routes
as stacks, instead of simply overwriting a route with a new one, just
push the new route - when it didn't work, pop it again. There need to be
some sanity checks, but it seemed like an interesting thought for the
firstname.lastname@example.org Andy Warner, Cray Research, Inc. (612) 683-5835